How much a self-licensee spends on complianceBY KANIKA SOOD | THURSDAY, 28 NOV 2019 4:16PMA Melbourne-based self-licensed financial planner has shared how much her practice spends on compliance for every $100 of its revenue. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Equip Super awards custody mandate
|Equip Super has selected a new custodian and back-office administrator to replace NAB Asset Servicing.
SMSFs' use of advisers plummets: Research
|The number of self-managed super funds (SMSFs) using advisers has reached a new low, with the proportion of SMSFs using advisers falling to 23% from 27% in the past 12 months, according to a Vanguard/Investment Trends report.
Financial services firms concerned about attracting staff
|New research from Robert Half suggests 74% of the finance industry is concerned about their ability to attract and retain staff.
ASIC issues experienced pathway guidance
|ASIC has released new guidance for financial advisers who could potentially qualify as experienced providers and skip further education and training.
Products
Featured Profile
Matt Gaden
HEAD OF AUSTRALIA
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
JANUS HENDERSON INVESTORS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Helping investors traverse financial markets and build their wealth during the peaks and troughs is Janus Henderson Investors head of Australia Matt Gaden's game plan. He tells Karren Vergara why in this long game of investing, active management wins.
Very interesting...
A 15 to 17 per cent of revenue estimate.
This becomes higher I suspect if new adviser modeling is taken to account.
This is because of fixed overheads in induction; fspr, complaints authority, FAP costs to practice and advise, PI cover again for both, induction costs, CRM, Research Tool Box, report writer (if not in CRM), Level Five, Professional Development on going. Harder as many costs not transferable which is exasperated when not every new professional succeeds .
Nice article...
Not sure where administrative expenses not related to compliance fit in this